<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Santa Monica Dispatch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.santamonicadispatch.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.santamonicadispatch.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 18:04:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Santa Monica Loses Its Balance by SMOGGER</title>
		<link>http://www.santamonicadispatch.com/2010/09/santa-monica-loses-its-balance/comment-page-1/#comment-4655</link>
		<dc:creator>SMOGGER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 18:04:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.santamonicadispatch.com/?p=2012#comment-4655</guid>
		<description>And recall, City Hall (+residents) turned down Target&#039;s request for the REI location.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And recall, City Hall (+residents) turned down Target&#8217;s request for the REI location.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Santa Monica Loses Its Balance by Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.santamonicadispatch.com/2010/09/santa-monica-loses-its-balance/comment-page-1/#comment-4650</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 21:46:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.santamonicadispatch.com/?p=2012#comment-4650</guid>
		<description>FYI, Costco is in Culver City - I believe the city&#039;s largest sales tax contributor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FYI, Costco is in Culver City &#8211; I believe the city&#8217;s largest sales tax contributor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SMPD Case Goes on the Road by Miguel Bravo</title>
		<link>http://www.santamonicadispatch.com/2010/08/smpd-case-goes-on-the-road/comment-page-1/#comment-4646</link>
		<dc:creator>Miguel Bravo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 19:29:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.santamonicadispatch.com/?p=1824#comment-4646</guid>
		<description>Publish a balanced review, like what, SMDP and The Mirror? pleease, too funny. Just because Mr.Jett declares that de la Torre (DLT) had an obligation doesn&#039;t make it so. If there is some contract that we don&#039;t know about then please do share Mr. Jettt. And so what if DLT knew the kid, everyone who actually lives the Santa Monica commoner reality knows that DLT handled that situation in the most efficient way and for the greater good of the whole community. The SMPD is just banking off the ruling class of Santa Monica&#039;s ignorance of the commoner/street reality and it&#039;s dynamics. This situation could have easily spilled out into a continuous series of violence but it did not, it got neutralized on the spot. Now ,thank god, there are 2 less young African and Indigenous men in the Youth Authority System trap. Young men fight, It happens. Welcome to the real world Mr. Jett. To me &quot;unethical and cowardly&quot; is conveniently leaving out accounts of SMPD&#039;s long history of subverting SM&#039;s organic Black &amp; Brown community organizations and leaders and ignoring the timing and (lack of) etiquette displayed by SMPD in this particular head hunt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Publish a balanced review, like what, SMDP and The Mirror? pleease, too funny. Just because Mr.Jett declares that de la Torre (DLT) had an obligation doesn&#8217;t make it so. If there is some contract that we don&#8217;t know about then please do share Mr. Jettt. And so what if DLT knew the kid, everyone who actually lives the Santa Monica commoner reality knows that DLT handled that situation in the most efficient way and for the greater good of the whole community. The SMPD is just banking off the ruling class of Santa Monica&#8217;s ignorance of the commoner/street reality and it&#8217;s dynamics. This situation could have easily spilled out into a continuous series of violence but it did not, it got neutralized on the spot. Now ,thank god, there are 2 less young African and Indigenous men in the Youth Authority System trap. Young men fight, It happens. Welcome to the real world Mr. Jett. To me &#8220;unethical and cowardly&#8221; is conveniently leaving out accounts of SMPD&#8217;s long history of subverting SM&#8217;s organic Black &amp; Brown community organizations and leaders and ignoring the timing and (lack of) etiquette displayed by SMPD in this particular head hunt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SMPD Case Goes on the Road by Mr. James Jett</title>
		<link>http://www.santamonicadispatch.com/2010/08/smpd-case-goes-on-the-road/comment-page-1/#comment-4618</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. James Jett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 18:40:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.santamonicadispatch.com/?p=1824#comment-4618</guid>
		<description>DISPATCH.  Get your facts straight, and publish a balanced review.  I did my own research and have been following this story.  Unlike a common passing citizen, Oscar had a DUTY and OBLIGATION to intervene in the fight because he had a RELATIONSHIP and ROLE as LEADER and MENTOR with one of the two kids.  Oscar knew one of the kids (&quot;R.D.&quot;) very well, and even knows his family.  &quot;R.D.&quot; is one of Oscar&#039;s special PYFC projects to help avoid gangs.  Talk to &quot;R.D.&#039;s&quot; family to verify that.  So, Oscar gets to the fight in its infancy and does NOTHING.  Halfway through Oscar actually helps the fight continue by holding the crowd back.  Only after the fight is WAY dangerous does Oscar feel the need to step in.  Shameful!   That&#039;s the truth.  Maybe not a criminally prosecutable case for 12 jurors to agree upon.  But ultimately Oscar proved himself to be unethical and cowardly.  I&#039;m getting tired of hearing Oscar&#039;s mantra that he is a &quot;victim&quot;.  Please!  By the way, did anyone talk to the other kid and his parents for their perspective?   Hmmmm.  Not very thorough DISPATCH!   I don&#039;t expect you will post my comments either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DISPATCH.  Get your facts straight, and publish a balanced review.  I did my own research and have been following this story.  Unlike a common passing citizen, Oscar had a DUTY and OBLIGATION to intervene in the fight because he had a RELATIONSHIP and ROLE as LEADER and MENTOR with one of the two kids.  Oscar knew one of the kids (&#8220;R.D.&#8221;) very well, and even knows his family.  &#8220;R.D.&#8221; is one of Oscar&#8217;s special PYFC projects to help avoid gangs.  Talk to &#8220;R.D.&#8217;s&#8221; family to verify that.  So, Oscar gets to the fight in its infancy and does NOTHING.  Halfway through Oscar actually helps the fight continue by holding the crowd back.  Only after the fight is WAY dangerous does Oscar feel the need to step in.  Shameful!   That&#8217;s the truth.  Maybe not a criminally prosecutable case for 12 jurors to agree upon.  But ultimately Oscar proved himself to be unethical and cowardly.  I&#8217;m getting tired of hearing Oscar&#8217;s mantra that he is a &#8220;victim&#8221;.  Please!  By the way, did anyone talk to the other kid and his parents for their perspective?   Hmmmm.  Not very thorough DISPATCH!   I don&#8217;t expect you will post my comments either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Save Our Schools Saves Nearly 20 Teachers &amp; Staff! by Sally JPA</title>
		<link>http://www.santamonicadispatch.com/2010/08/save-our-schools-saves-nearly-20-teachers-staff/comment-page-1/#comment-4579</link>
		<dc:creator>Sally JPA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2010 20:29:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.santamonicadispatch.com/?p=1991#comment-4579</guid>
		<description>Amazing! Great job, everyone. It&#039;s so moving to see people work together like this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amazing! Great job, everyone. It&#8217;s so moving to see people work together like this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SMPD Case Goes on the Road by Miguel Bravo</title>
		<link>http://www.santamonicadispatch.com/2010/08/smpd-case-goes-on-the-road/comment-page-1/#comment-4498</link>
		<dc:creator>Miguel Bravo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 06:08:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.santamonicadispatch.com/?p=1824#comment-4498</guid>
		<description>Wow. Great article. By far the only one that brings some decent light and justice to this situation.
Thank you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. Great article. By far the only one that brings some decent light and justice to this situation.<br />
Thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on To: SMC Board of Trustees and President Chui Tsang by To: SMC Board of Trustees and President Chui Tsang &#8211; Santa Monica Dispatch &#124; Hot Trend News</title>
		<link>http://www.santamonicadispatch.com/2010/07/to-smc-board-of-trustees-and-president-chui-tsang/comment-page-1/#comment-4463</link>
		<dc:creator>To: SMC Board of Trustees and President Chui Tsang &#8211; Santa Monica Dispatch &#124; Hot Trend News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 12:52:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.santamonicadispatch.com/?p=1812#comment-4463</guid>
		<description>[...] To: SMC Board of Trustees and President Chui Tsang [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] To: SMC Board of Trustees and President Chui Tsang [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on To: SMC Board of Trustees and President Chui Tsang by To: SMC Board of Trustees and President Chui Tsang &#8211; Santa Monica Dispatch &#124; Gnews Today</title>
		<link>http://www.santamonicadispatch.com/2010/07/to-smc-board-of-trustees-and-president-chui-tsang/comment-page-1/#comment-4459</link>
		<dc:creator>To: SMC Board of Trustees and President Chui Tsang &#8211; Santa Monica Dispatch &#124; Gnews Today</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 11:06:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.santamonicadispatch.com/?p=1812#comment-4459</guid>
		<description>[...] T&amp;#959: SMC Board &amp;#959f Trustees &amp;#1072nd President Chui Tsang [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] T&amp;#959: SMC Board &amp;#959f Trustees &amp;#1072nd President Chui Tsang [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on To: SMC Board of Trustees and President Chui Tsang by Joanne Curtis</title>
		<link>http://www.santamonicadispatch.com/2010/07/to-smc-board-of-trustees-and-president-chui-tsang/comment-page-1/#comment-4449</link>
		<dc:creator>Joanne Curtis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 18:09:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.santamonicadispatch.com/?p=1812#comment-4449</guid>
		<description>Dear SMC Trustees:

The necessity of the proposed Santa Monica City College Master Plan 2010 needs to be re-evaluated for many reasons, not the least of which is the desperate state of the Santa Monica &amp; Malibu School District&#039;s financial situation.

With so many financial constraints placed on the school districts, it would be a virtual slap in the community taxpayers&#039; faces for the City College to begin COSMETIC demolition and reconstruction to its campuses, when the local schools are being forced to lay off teachers and cut back on programs. 

Has it not occurred to any of you that the money would be better spent in the form of assistance to the schooling of our younger children, who will be precluded from a full educational experience, due to lack of state funds to support them? 

While the money may be &#039;earmarked&#039; for college expansion/beautification projects, we all know that where there is a will, there is a way! You, the College Trustees, need to join forces with the COMMUNITY to assure a high quality education for the children who reside here.

The communities are coming to the realization that, the constant/automatic bond requests for the Santa Monica Community College &quot;improvements,&quot; to accommodate a student population that is 85% or more non-resident, are excessive, unreasonable and may be more related to salaries and egos. 

Additionally, demolishing Corsair Stadium is not indicated according to the Stadium Seismic Study of 2006, wherein only RETROFITS to the existing stadium were recommended.

The effects on the surrounding neighborhoods, relative to demolition and reconstruction of the stadium and the Liberal Arts building, will be enormous, and the proposed plan is inconsistent with the City&#039;s goals of recycling and living green!

The draft EIR includes a letter from the SCAQMD dated June 4, 2010 that notes that the College failed to assess air quality impacts during the projects&#039; construction and operation. This OVERSIGHT is indicative of a lack of concern for the health, safety  and comfort of the neighboring residents and their children, and is of great concern to us all.

REMODEL AND RETROFIT needs to become your mantra, and hopefully you all will listen and take appropriate action!

Sincerely,

Joanne Curtis
Sunset Park Resident and Homeowner</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear SMC Trustees:</p>
<p>The necessity of the proposed Santa Monica City College Master Plan 2010 needs to be re-evaluated for many reasons, not the least of which is the desperate state of the Santa Monica &amp; Malibu School District&#8217;s financial situation.</p>
<p>With so many financial constraints placed on the school districts, it would be a virtual slap in the community taxpayers&#8217; faces for the City College to begin COSMETIC demolition and reconstruction to its campuses, when the local schools are being forced to lay off teachers and cut back on programs. </p>
<p>Has it not occurred to any of you that the money would be better spent in the form of assistance to the schooling of our younger children, who will be precluded from a full educational experience, due to lack of state funds to support them? </p>
<p>While the money may be &#8216;earmarked&#8217; for college expansion/beautification projects, we all know that where there is a will, there is a way! You, the College Trustees, need to join forces with the COMMUNITY to assure a high quality education for the children who reside here.</p>
<p>The communities are coming to the realization that, the constant/automatic bond requests for the Santa Monica Community College &#8220;improvements,&#8221; to accommodate a student population that is 85% or more non-resident, are excessive, unreasonable and may be more related to salaries and egos. </p>
<p>Additionally, demolishing Corsair Stadium is not indicated according to the Stadium Seismic Study of 2006, wherein only RETROFITS to the existing stadium were recommended.</p>
<p>The effects on the surrounding neighborhoods, relative to demolition and reconstruction of the stadium and the Liberal Arts building, will be enormous, and the proposed plan is inconsistent with the City&#8217;s goals of recycling and living green!</p>
<p>The draft EIR includes a letter from the SCAQMD dated June 4, 2010 that notes that the College failed to assess air quality impacts during the projects&#8217; construction and operation. This OVERSIGHT is indicative of a lack of concern for the health, safety  and comfort of the neighboring residents and their children, and is of great concern to us all.</p>
<p>REMODEL AND RETROFIT needs to become your mantra, and hopefully you all will listen and take appropriate action!</p>
<p>Sincerely,</p>
<p>Joanne Curtis<br />
Sunset Park Resident and Homeowner</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Pugh+Scarpa Awarded St. Louis Project by Daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.santamonicadispatch.com/2007/12/pughscarpa-awarded-st-louis-project/comment-page-1/#comment-4448</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 01:48:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://74.54.108.212/?p=235#comment-4448</guid>
		<description>http://www.youtube.com/user/larryscarpa#p/a/u/0/miVZ50_Ih40

On Thursday June 10th, 2010 Pugh + Scarpa received the 2010 National American Institute of Architects Firm Award during the Awards Ceremony at the National American Institute of Architects Convention in Miami, Florida.  Above is the link to a short video that was shown during the ceremony. This award is the highest honor an architecture firm can receive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/user/larryscarpa#p/a/u/0/miVZ50_Ih40" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/user/larryscarpa#p/a/u/0/miVZ50_Ih40</a></p>
<p>On Thursday June 10th, 2010 Pugh + Scarpa received the 2010 National American Institute of Architects Firm Award during the Awards Ceremony at the National American Institute of Architects Convention in Miami, Florida.  Above is the link to a short video that was shown during the ceremony. This award is the highest honor an architecture firm can receive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
