Alan Epstein, “lead negotiator of MSD Capital,
one of the owners of the Miramar Hotel,” is
quoted in Surf Santa Monica as saying, “With
all the demands for services and amenities
from customers, the cost of building new lux-
ury hotels has skyrocketed.

“Given the risk profile of such projects,
construction lenders have become quite cau-
tious. As a result, financing has become
difficult without a residential component.”

What? Does Epstein expect us to be sympa-
thetic, and allow him to have his way with
Santa Monica because building here is really

MSD Capital and the Miramar are both owned
by Michael Dell, a billionaire who lives in
Texas, developed the Dell computer and is
currently engaged in trying to take his com-
pany, Dell, private, and doing battle with
Carl Icahn, also a billionaire, who believes
the company should remain public and Dell
should be replaced as CEO. (see story below)

“I am ready to fight and I am committed to
doing what I believe is right for the com-
pany,” Michael Dell told The Wall Street

At Epstein’s initial presentation of what he
called the “Miramar revitalization,” which
would have doubled its size, the inclusion
of 120 condominiums was questioned. Epstein
said, the condos were crucial. They were
“the equity.” Their sale would finance the
cost of the redevelopment, thus sparing Dell
from having to put any of his own money into
the redevelopment.

The plans were subsequently changed. The new
plan is dominated by a 320-foot tall faux
Art Deco tower, which would contain the 120
condominiums, along with other elements from-
the original plan. At 320 feet, the new Mira-
mar would be twice as tall as the Huntley
Hotel, which is directly behind the Miramar
across Second Street. TWICE AS TALL AS THE

And an ever-enlarging number of residents
say, at every opportunity, “We are ready to
fight and committed to doing what we believe
is right for this beach town.”

Surely, Mr. Dell would understand our position.

Mr. Epstein doesn’t. City Hall doesn’t. The
Chamber of Commerce doesn’t. The developer
don’t. Downtown Santa Monica, Inc. doesn’t.
The Convention and Visitors Bureau doesn’t.
They all think the operative word is MORE –
more “luxury” hotels, more oversized, undis-
tinguished mixed use complexes, more revenue,
more traffic, more profit.

We, the people disagree.

What Epstein, City manager Rod Gould, the plan-
ners and consultants, the Chamber, the deve-
lopers, Third Street bosses, the hype meisters,
all the would-be shakers and movers and their
sycophants, the critics of resident critics
choose to ignore or fail to understand is that
Santa Monica, this gloriously idiosyncratic
beach town, isn’t a business or real estate
or merchandise. It’s a place. A real place
with a complex history. It was founded 138
years ago. It’s very small (8.3 square miles),
the most densely populated town in southern
California, situated in the heart of the
fabled Southern California coast – “the for-
tunate coast,” Hamlin Garland called it,
It’s been on a first-name basis with the
world for generations. It was the site of the
Vanderbilt car races, In the Golden Age of
Hollywood, in the 1930s, four of the five
studio heads lived on the Santa Monica Gold
Coast, along with Fairbanks and Pickford, Cary
Grant, “boy wonder” Irving Thalberg and Norma
Shearer, queen of MGM, and, of course, Marion
Davies and William Randolph Hearst, and all
three of the Talmadge sisters.

For years, Salka Viertel, screenwriter and
Garbo’s closest advisor, had a Sunday salon
at her house in the Canyon, which attracted
other writers who’d fled Hitler, English nov-
elist Aldous Huxley, who lived in the Holly-
wood Hills, the original Tarzan, Johnny Weis-
smuller, and assorted actors and actresses.

Four World Cruiser airplanes were built here,
and took off from here to fly around the world.
Three of the four made it. A gaggle of women
tennis stars from Santa Monica dominated the
sport in the 1940s. In World War II, Douglas
Aircraft’s 22,000 workers assembled thousands
of war planes here. With Malibu, Santa Monica
introduced and was the epicenter of surfing
on the mainland.

Charles and Ray Eames reinvented domestic life
here. Painters were drawn by the light, the
colors. Raymond Chandler set some of his stories
here (i.e. Bay City), and featured corrupt cops.
Christopher Isherwood, an Englishman, arrived
here in his 20s, wrote many books, lived here
for 50 years, died and was buried here.

The world’s most influential architect, Frank
Gehry, turned an ordinary tract house into
an ever-changing sculpture of a sort.

Some of Hollywood’s best films were shot here.
The Z boys conjured Dogtown here. Nearly a
dozen great independent bookstores were once
here, including the legendary Midnight Special.
Tom Hayden and Jane Fonda’s Center for Economic
Democracy was here. The nation’s most radical
rent control ordinance was approved here in 1979.

Esther McCoy, arguably America’s best writer on
architecture, lived in Santa Monica most of her
adult life, and died here at 89. She wrote about
the modernists — Schindler, Neutra, Gill, the
Wrights – father and son, and the architects
who followed them. It was a very exciting time,
a crucial time in the rise of Los Angeles. Rey-
nar Banham, no slouch himself as a writer and
teacher of design, said Los Angeles’s two
greatest architectural treasures were the Gamble
house in Pasadena and McCoy.

If McCoy were still alive and writing in her tiny
semi-Schindler house in Ocean Park, she would be
as horrified at what passes for planning and arch-
itecture these days as many residents are.

The Santa Monica Conservancy and the Landmarks
Commission have managed to save many buildings
and other things of value from the bulldozers,
but the developers and their local supporters
are still coming – City staff, chamber members,
self-anointed community leaders and shills, real
estate hucksters, and the Council Four who have
taken campaign contributions from developers,
and are still agitating for MORE.

And so residents must keep saying NO – often
and emphatically, because this extraordinary
town, our town is at a crucial verge, in danger
of choking on a surfeit of profoundly clumsy

It is not our job to cheer the developers and
their profoundly mediocre plans on. It is our
job to preserve and protect this extraordinary
town from the philistines.

NOTE: If you haven’t read McCoy, read PIECING
TOGETHER LOS ANGELES, edited, with an essay by
Susan Morgan, East of Borneo Books


Los Angeles Times story

By Michael Hiltzik
August 2, 2013, 5:09 p.m.

Back in January 2011, I predicted that the Fed-
eral Communications Commission’s approval of the
Comcast-NBC merger would be a disaster for the

Allowing the merger of a major cable operator
with a major network would undermine the public
interest by giving Comcast too much market power.
Cable companies are already monopolies in most
major metro areas, and that’s especially true
when it comes to the increasingly crucial broad-
band Internet service.

The irony is that Time Warner Cable and CBS are
not affiliated, as are Comcast and NBC, but their
ruthless treatment of their joint customers just
shows even more how derelict the FCC was in allow-
ing the last merger.

As you already know if you’re a Time Warner Cable
subscriber, as part of a contract fee dispute,
the cable company cut off access to CBS-owned
channels Friday. That includes the Showtime pay-
TV network. Some CBS programming is normally –
online at — but if Time Warner is your
Internet provider, CBS has cut off your access to
that too. It’s as though these two adversaries
are conspiring to use their market power to vic-
timize their customers.

It’s unclear how long this standoff will last, but
five minutes is five minutes too many. Responsible
telecom providers would have moved heaven and earth
to avoid darkening their customers’ screens. Time
Warner and CBS both have shown they don’t deserve
to be in the marketplace.

This is what happens when monopolistic behavior
becomes ingrained in a market while regulators sit
on their thumbs. If the FCC had signaled two years
ago that it wouldn’t countenance such contemptuous
treatment of telecommunications customers — and
backed that up by vetoing the largest merger in
the space — then both Time Warner Cable and CBS
would think twice before blacking out paying cus-

The sad fact is that in today’s world of lazy,
indifferent government regulation, industry has
come to assume that it can walk all over the cus-
tomer. When will the regulators wake up? The pub-
lic interest is at stake.


Los Angeles Times story

So much for “best and final proposal.”

A little over a week after Michael Dell warned
that he wouldn’t sweeten his bid for Dell Inc.,
the company founder — on the brink of losing a
shareholder vote to take the company private
— has done just that.

On the morning of a special shareholders meeting
at headquarters in Round Rock, Texas, the company
announced that Michael Dell, along with investment
firm Silver Lake, had increased the purchase price
by a dime to $13.75 a share. They also agreed to
pay a special dividend of 13 cents a share and
guaranteed that the third-quarter dividend of 8
cents a share would be paid at or before closing.

Shares of Dell were up 5.3% to $13.64 at 7:30 a.m.

The company also said it would change the voting
standard so that only actual votes cast would
count toward the tally. Previously, absentee votes
were to be counted as “no” votes, a rule that Mich-
ael Dell, who is also chairman and chief executive,
had been fighting to change.

In light of the latest offer, the PC maker quickly
adjourned the meeting and delayed it to allow
shareholders to weigh the new terms. It is now
scheduled for Sept. 12 at 7 a.m. PDT; this is the
third time the meeting, originally scheduled for
July 18, has been delayed.

The last-ditch effort raises the offer by at least
$350 million, the company said, and is just the
latest development in the tug-of-war between Mich-
ael Dell and billionaire activist investor Carl
Icahn over the future of the struggling tech comp-

Whereas Dell wants to take the company he founded
in his college dorm room private, Icahn is propos-
ing a recapitalization and a major shakeup of Dell’s
board and executive management.

The two sides have been bickering for months. On
Wednesday, Icahn issued another open letter to
shareholders titled, “Let the Desperate Dell De-
bacle Die.”

“Enough! The stockholders have spoken — and they
do not want to be frozen out by Michael Dell/-
Lake. Let the vote happen on Friday,” Icahn said.
“Michael Dell has said he is ‘at peace either way.’
We are glad to hear it!”

Dell’s special committee also pushed back the re-
cord date for shareholders: Now shareholders as of
Aug. 13, instead of June 3, can take place in the
vote, another change designed to help bolster sup-
port for Michael Dell’s bid.


Laurence Eubank will read from his new novel,
RIDE DOWN THE WIND, and sign books at the Hunt-
ley Hotel in Santa Monica from 7 to 9:30 pm
this evening. There will be drinks, appetizers
and free parking.The event is being hosted by
Elizabeth Van Denburgh, Mary Marlow and Grafton

A historical novel, RIDE DOWN THE WIND, takes
place in 1851 and is set on the clipper ships
that tamed the Atlantic.