Open Letter from PNA
To: Expo Authority
Cc: City of Santa Monica City Council, Metro Transportation Authority, Department of Toxic Substances Control- Cal-EPAFrom: Pico Neighborhood Association
Regarding the proposed Expo Line maintenance yard to be sited in the Pico Neighborhood of Santa Monica at the previous Verizon site, adjacent to residences and Stewart St. Park,
We have an objection which needs to be addressed. Stewart St. Park is the site of a former landfill. As such, it is our understanding that methane gas from landfill decomposition currently seeps up and out of the park as well as laterally through underground services. Santa Monica prohibits barbeque fires in the park for fear of ground gas explosions. Methane gas, once vented, does not remain static, but moves with air currents. It is also highly flammable. Gas cannot release to the atmosphere from under asphalt and other surface coverings.
It is our understanding that underground services could channel gases and concentrate gases at or above the Lower Explosive Limits (5000ppm methane). The proposed maintenance yard could concentrate the gases under the surface coverings or under buildings, as they are currently designed to enclose the facilities to mitigate noise.
It is possible that the yard will have many sources of ignition which could ignite underground concentrations of gases in buildings and various confined structures.
It is our understanding that the proposed Expo Line maintenance yard will be utilizing 750 volt power lines in its operations to run multiple trains into the station. These power lines can possibly occasionally spark. The Expo service fleet utilizes internal combustion engine and hybrid engine trucks, but no propane or LNG powered vehicles. Could this be because of the ignition hazard they would pose? We are concerned that the combination of methane gas seepage and migration with high voltage electricity could pose a serious ignition and subsequent explosion hazard to nearby residents and park visitors as well as to Expo workers and riders and to passing motorists, pedestrians and cyclists, possibly causing immediate loss of life as well as property damage.
Is there the possibility that a high concentration of methane gas could come from the park, either above ground or below ground via service lines, to within close enough proximity of the high voltage lines in the maintenance yard, just a few feet away, that a spark produced from those lines could result in igniting that gas, resulting in an explosion? What guarantee do we have that this does not pose a serious health and safety risk to adjacent residents, passing motorists, Expo riders, on site rail employees and park visitors? Have any independent inspectors assessed the risk that this combination poses? Have any independent engineers or geologists performed borings to assess the amount of methane gas being produced by the now defunct landfill at Stewart Park? Has gas migration from the park been documented? Has OSHA assessed the safety of the situation?
When can we have definitive answers from experts regarding these questions? Can you prove and guarantee that this wouldn’t be dangerous? Will the Expo and Metro Authorities swear under penalty of perjury that the proximity of leaking methane gas is not a danger? Will the City of Santa Monica and the Expo Authority assume all liability should there be an explosion? Until such time as this information is publicly available, we strongly urge you to relocate the Expo Line maintenance yard to preclude this life threatening safety risk to our community. Thank you.
The Pico Neighborhood Association Board of Directors: Maria Loya,Co-Chair,
Wes Thompson, Co-Chair, Ana Jara,
Vice Chair, Irma Carran, Treasurer,
Catherine Eldridge, Joseph Blanks,
Linda Piera-Avila, Gina De Baca,
Mike Jackson, Kristina Lizama,
Ilda Jimenez y West, Alan Quinn.





I am very supportive of the issue of methane gas leakage from under Stewart Park being brought to the wider public attention. I had mentioned it in a PNA meeting and it was picked up in the PNA Newsletter. In this article in the Santa Monica Dispatch wider dangers were explored and made public. Futhermore the issue was brought to the attention in a public meeting Expo sponsered at City Civic Center in Santa Monica last Wednesday. I fully support PNA officers and members in this matter. Gas explosions can be dangerous if experienced unexpectedly which had happened at my house years back in Germany during recontruction hurting my mother and another more severe explosion hurting a neighbor. We have to safeguard the public from any eventualities. Considering this danger the Verizon site should not be the prefered site for the Expo Rail Yard. With best regards, Christel Andersen, PNA member and living in the Stewart Park neighborhood.
no disrespect intended here but? some on is going to have to prove these, and the city isnt going to be the one doing that against itself? don’t you think?
The Expo Authority’s proposal to place a 7 acre maintenance yard on Exposition Blvd. in the Pico Neighborhood is an environmental hazard in more ways than one. The combination of methane gas that has been found around the proposed site and high voltage electricity emanating from the electric trains is a serious danger to residents. It is the responsibility of our governmental bodies and elected representatives to ensure our safety. The maintenance yard doesn’t belong in a residential community that currently has to live with methane ground contamination. The combination is potentially explosive.
One reason people gave support Pam O’Connor for re-election to the SM City Council is that she would be “our” representative on the Expo Authority and MTA Board that decides these issues. Where is Councilmember Pam O’Connor’s on this issue? Does she not care of the impact that this maintenance yard will have on families that live in the area? Does she not care about the potential loss of lives due to such an irresponsible decision to place a maintenance yard in close proximity to methane gas? Is Pam O’Connor selling SM residents out to get the political support she needs for re-election?